Skip to content
Riminilakes Blog

The Venezuelan Crisis Could Now Shape President Trump's Political Legacy - as well as the United States' Role in the World

In the wake of executing a evening of shock and awe in Venezuela, Donald Trump now appears to be entering the nation-building arena.

In a striking press conference at his Mar-a-Lago estate on Saturday morning, the commander-in-chief announced that US forces had successfully seized Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro and his wife in an late-night operation in Caracas.

Trump then indicated that a group featuring Secretary of State Marco Rubio and Secretary of Defence Pete Hegseth, working with Venezuelans, would be seizing the reins of the beleaguered nation.

"We are going to run the country until such time as we can do a secure, proper and careful transition," he said.

What exactly "running the country" entails is ambiguous, but the vow signifies an sudden shift in direction for the president, laden with inconsistencies and daunting obstacles.

A leader who ran on opposing "endless conflicts", who sharply criticised past US attempts at overthrowing governments and who promised to implement an "America First" international policy is now betting his administration on effectively rebuilding a South American nation whose economy is in ruins and whose political stability has been undermined by decades of authoritarian rule.

Yet, Trump was relentlessly optimistic.

He said his administration has a "perfect track record of winning" – and that this would be no exception. He pledged to enlist American oil firms to overhaul Venezuela's deteriorating industrial infrastructure, supplying financing for the American reconstruction efforts and benefitting the Venezuelan people.

He declined to rule out deploying American soldiers to Venezuela to further these efforts. "We're not afraid of boots on the ground…we had boots on the ground last night," he told reporters.

Trump, a sharp critic of the US invasion of Iraq, will now have to remember the words of one of the American planners of the Iraq War, Secretary of State Colin Powell: "You break it, you bought it."

A Changed Global Approach

The US has altered Venezuela's prospects – for better or worse.

Trump took office nearly a year ago promising to be a diplomat, but over the past year he has demonstrated that he is more than willing to use military force around the globe.

In the past week, he ordered air strikes on Syria and Nigeria. In 2025, he targeted nuclear facilities in Iran, suspected narco-trafficking boats in the Caribbean, insurgent groups in Yemen, armed groups in Somalia and Islamic militants in Iraq.

In contrast to past operations, which have largely involved rockets and warplanes that minimize the risk of American forces to danger, Trump's Venezuela strike – and his commitments to the future of that nation – are notably distinct.

His objective, he said during his briefing, is to "restore Venezuela's greatness."

Reactions from Allies and Critics

That twist on Trump's "MAGA" – or Maga - mantra might prove difficult for some of Trump's supporters to swallow.

Congresswoman Marjorie Taylor Greene, a one-time Trump loyalist who broke with the president after accusing him of deserting his political base, was swift to criticize the president's actions on social media.

"Americans' disgust with our own government's endless use of force and support of foreign wars is justified because we are compelled to pay for it," she wrote. "This is what many in Maga thought they voted to end. Boy were we wrong."

Another prominent Trump critic, Republican Congressman Thomas Massie, contrasted the official rationale for Maduro's arrest – on weapons and cocaine trafficking charges – with Trump's explanation that the operation was to retake seized US oil and halt fentanyl production.

Most Republican lawmakers rallied behind the president, with House Speaker Mike Johnson describing the armed intervention against a "illegitimate government" as "firm and legitimate".

Policy Rationales and Worldwide Consequences

During his appearance, the president said the Venezuelan operation advanced his "America First" agenda because it ensured US hemispheric security and provided a steady source of oil.

He dusted off the Monroe Doctrine – an nineteenth-century American foreign policy that declared the Western Hemisphere should be free from influence by European powers – and rebranded it the "Trump Doctrine."

The action in Venezuela, Trump said, shows that "American dominance in the Western Hemisphere will not be questioned again."

The purpose of the new US national security strategy, he said, was to "protect trade, land and resources that are fundamental to our national security." He labeled the Western Hemisphere as America's "home region."

Trump's decision to capture Maduro will provoke broader questions in global politics, however, and impact American relations with the world's other major global powers.

The Chinese government released a statement voicing shock and denouncing what it said was a reckless assault on a sovereign nation.

During the Biden administration, the US offered comparable censures of Russia following its invasion of Ukraine. Now the Trump administration is trying to mediate a peace deal between those two nations – one that has frequently seemed to be leaning to the Russian side.

Don Bacon, a centrist Republican congressman, expressed worry about the message Trump's actions might send.

"My primary concern is now Russia will use this to justify their illegal and brutal military actions against Ukraine, or China to rationalize an attack of Taiwan."

Opposition and Legal Scrutiny

Trump's Democratic critics were sharper.

"The United States should not be administering other countries for any reason," said a senator who serves on the Foreign Relations Committee. "We should have understood by now not to get entangled in perpetual conflicts and regime change missions that carry catastrophic consequences for Americans."

Another senior Democratic lawmaker said Maduro is a lawbreaker and a autocrat with a record of human rights abuses. But he condemned Trump's decision not to consult with congressional leaders prior to initiating the attack.

"The President has the constitutional responsibility to follow the law and uphold institutional norms in the United States," he said. "That is what placing America First demands."

Trump, in his press conference, said that he chose not to inform Congress because he was concerned they would "leak" details of the operation prior to the attack.

An Uncertain Future

That mission was a success – with zero American casualties and minimal harm to US equipment. Trump, with his typical bravado, portrayed the operation as a "daring raid" and "among the most astonishing, successful and impressive demonstrations of American military might and proficiency in American history."

Now he is staking his presidency on that success continuing, as the US says it will assume responsibility for administering and reconstructing Venezuela - though what that actually means is unknown. He and his team must rebuild a nation that has been in turmoil for decades while calming a region that is sure to be cautious of what Trump's foreign policy has planned for them.

About the author

Kristina Lee

A passionate writer and cultural enthusiast with a knack for uncovering hidden gems across the UK.

Riminilakes Blog

Type to search articles.